REX vs. Zillow Case: Was It a Website Update or Antitrust Violation?

theresa rolen • February 19, 2025

Did Zillow’s move harm non-MLS brokers?

A three-judge panel in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is weighing whether Zillow’s 2021 website update—segregating MLS and non-MLS listings—was an independent business decision or an anti-competitive scheme driven by NAR’s no-comingling rule. REX, the now-defunct discount brokerage, argues that Zillow’s compliance with the rule unfairly buried its listings, contributing to its downfall.

Zillow maintains it simply adjusted its website to align with MLS participation rules and that REX’s claims amount to shifting blame for business failure. NAR and Zillow deny any direct agreement to restrain trade, emphasizing the rule’s optional nature. However, the DOJ weighed in, asserting that even optional rules can create anti-competitive concerted actions.


At stake is whether Zillow’s move was a routine website redesign or an unlawful trade restriction harming non-MLS brokers. The court’s decision could have major implications for how real estate portals display listings and interact with MLSs in the future.


Why This Matters:


The ruling could impact listing visibility on major platforms and reshape how non-MLS agents compete in the digital marketplace. Agents should stay informed as the case unfolds, as it may influence future MLS policies and online listing practices.

By theresa rolen January 24, 2026
Building or Fixing Your Credit To Buy A Home
By theresa rolen January 24, 2026
The January Reputation in Real Estate Myth
By theresa rolen January 7, 2026
Building a Home Without the “What If?” Panic
By theresa rolen December 30, 2025
Gift of Equity vs. Gift Funds in Family Home Purchases (And How to Avoid Blowing Up the Deal)
By theresa rolen December 30, 2025
When a Pre-Approval Isn’t Actually Approval Why Realtors Can’t Afford to Blindly Trust Every Lender In today’s market, getting an offer accepted isn’t the hard part. Getting it to close is. Lately, I’ve been pulled into multiple “rescue missions”—offers accepted, homes taken off the market, timelines set… only for the deal to start unraveling once underwriting gets involved. Different buyers. Different lenders. Same root problem. A pre-approval that never should’ve been issued . A Real Scenario Realtors Are Seeing More Often A buyer submits what looks like a strong offer. The pre-approval checks the box. Everyone moves forward. But once the file is examined: Less than two years of work history Variable income only (hourly, commission, fluctuating pay) Prior history? Straight out of high school This doesn’t mean the buyer can’t qualify. It does mean the file requires precision , not assumptions. The Truth About Pre-Approvals (This Is the Part That Matters) A pre-approval is only as strong as : the income used to qualify it the guidelines actually followed and the lender who understands the difference between “maybe” and “mortgageable” Variable income + limited history isn’t impossible — but it requires structure, documentation, and time . What it does not tolerate is shortcuts, guesswork, or optimism disguised as confidence. Where Deals Start to Break Many weak pre-approvals rely on: Income that hasn’t been averaged long enough Pay that looks good on paper but doesn’t meet guideline requirements Front-end approvals that haven’t been reviewed by underwriting Everything looks fine—until underwriting gets involved. And underwriting always gets involved. What Buyer’s Agents Should Be Asking (Without Playing Underwriter) You don’t need to know every lending rule. You do need to ask smarter questions. 1. Is the buyer’s income salaried or variable? If it’s variable, averaging and seasoning rules apply. 2. How much of that income is actually being used to qualify? Not projected income. Not potential income. Qualified income. 3. Does the buyer meet the full two-year work history requirement? If not, how is the gap being documented and justified? 4. Has an underwriter reviewed this income yet—or is this a front-end pre-approval? This affects how much risk the seller is taking on. 5. What’s the backup plan if income is reduced or disallowed? Strong lenders already know the answer. If those answers aren’t clear, the offer isn’t strong—no matter the price. Why This Matters for Sellers When a seller accepts a shaky offer: The home comes off the market Showings stop Leverage disappears If the deal collapses late, sellers lose time, momentum, and often negotiating power. A strong offer isn’t just about price. It’s about: financing that survives underwriting a lender who answers the phone and a buyer who is truly qualified The Realtor Takeaway Trust is important. Verification is smarter. The best agents don’t just get contracts signed—they get them closed . Ask better questions. Vet the lender. And remember: hope is not a lending strategy. Book time to chat My Calendar Theresa Rolen, Loan Originator NMLS# 2249004 | Brokerage NMLS #1850081 Cell 913-705-0049 Email Theresa@SummitLendingUSA.com Theresa Rolen Cell (913) 705-0049 Trolen.myjourney@outlook.com
By theresa rolen October 17, 2025
When the “For Sale” Signs Multiply — Local Edition (Leavenworth / Liberty / KC)
By theresa rolen October 15, 2025
Refinancing—The Smart Way to Ditch High-Interest Debt
By theresa rolen October 11, 2025
The Basics — Why Mortgage Insurance Is Actually A Good Thing
By theresa rolen October 11, 2025
Refresh your pipeline leads...
By theresa rolen June 7, 2025
The Switch To a Buyers Market...